Re: UAL - further discussion

This is an archived post from the old bulletin board. For new posts, see the forum.

Posted by Brett Zamir ( on November 26, 2002 at 15:16:07:

In Reply to: UAL - further discussion posted by Brett Zamir on November 26, 2002 at 15:11:38:

Incidentally I might respond to the article I referenced - the world auxiliary language need not be the same as the one ultimately chosen as the ONLY language. In fact, it would seem better not to deal with that issue at the present time (except to the degree that we personally realize that losing living languages in the LONG term is not a bad thing), given that people are not ready for such a thing, and it might only raise further unnecessary objections as people might begin to perceive even a world AUXILIARY language as unduly impinging on diversity.


this topic is closed - post at