Bibliography: #GE9T4Q9I

key	GE9T4Q9I
title	Rationality in Academic Disciplines
author	Mohanan, K. P.
authority control	K. P. Mohanan
item type	Journal article
publication year	2001
date	2001
publication title	Singapore Bahá'í Studies Review
abstract note	Following Fleck and Kuhn, the academia in the twenty first century have come to recognize the value of acknowledging and understanding the diversity of "epistemic Cultures”, that is, the thought styles of communities engaged in the production of knowledge. For an academic community to construct public knowledge through teamwork, there are two important pre-requisites. First, the members of the community must have a shared language that presupposes approximately the same pairings of concepts and words. Second, they must have a shared epistemic value system on the basis of which they make collective decisions on what is credible and what is not, and choose between competing candidates for excellence in knowledge. A subset of such criteria for critical thinking also allows us to engage in rational argumentation within the community.If we define ''dialogue" as a two-way conversation between two parties, it follows that contemporaneity is a necessary condition for all dialogue: we cannot have any dialogue with ancient cultures or civilizations of the past. If dialogue involves rational argumentation across epistemic cultures, it is equally important that their epistemic value systems have a set of shared commitments as well. In my paper, I will make an attempt to outline such a shared set of commitments that provide the basis for dialogue across academic cultures, ranging from history and philosophy to biology and physics, and various sub-communities within a discipline.
pages	87-107
volume	6
language	English
manual tags	DIALOGUE; VALUES; ACADEMIA

summary view details

browse all, summary view browse all, detaled view